手法を比較
選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。
| VOSviewer支援スコーピングレビュー× | スコーピングレビュー× | |
|---|---|---|
| 分野 | 科学計量学 | 科学計量学 |
| 系統 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 提唱年≠ | 2010s–present | 2005 |
| 提唱者≠ | Combination: Arksey & O'Malley (scoping review, 2005); van Eck & Waltman (VOSviewer, 2010) | Hilary Arksey & Lisa O'Malley |
| 種類≠ | Hybrid review methodology | Evidence synthesis review design |
| 原典≠ | van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. DOI ↗ | Arksey, H., & O'Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32. DOI ↗ |
| 別名 | VOSviewer scoping review, bibliometric-enhanced scoping review, VOS-assisted scoping review, science-mapping scoping review | scoping study, literature scoping, evidence mapping review, rapid evidence map |
| 関連≠ | 5 | 6 |
| 概要≠ | A VOSviewer-assisted scoping review integrates the structured, broad-mapping purpose of a scoping review with VOSviewer's bibliometric visualization capabilities. After standard database searching and eligibility screening, the retained records are exported to VOSviewer, which produces co-authorship, keyword co-occurrence, and citation-based cluster maps. These visual outputs guide thematic synthesis, reveal intellectual structure, and make the scope of a field immediately transparent. | A scoping review is a systematic evidence-synthesis method that maps the breadth and nature of research on a topic — identifying key concepts, evidence types, and gaps — without necessarily appraising study quality or pooling effect sizes. Developed by Arksey and O'Malley (2005) and refined by Levac and colleagues (2010), it is particularly valuable for emerging or heterogeneous fields where a full systematic review would be premature or infeasible. |
| ScholarGateデータセット ↗ |
|
|