手法を比較

	視覚的誘発・解釈学的現象学	解釈的現象学
分野	質的手法	質的手法
系統	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
提唱年	1990s–2000s (integration emerged in qualitative health and education research)	1927 (Heidegger); systematised for human sciences by van Manen in 1990
提唱者	Synthesised from van Manen's hermeneutic phenomenology and Harper's photo-elicitation tradition	Martin Heidegger (philosophical foundation); Max van Manen (methodological systematisation)
種類	Qualitative research design	Qualitative interpretive research design
原典	Harper, D. (2002). Talking about pictures: A case for photo elicitation. Visual Studies, 17(1), 13–26.	van Manen, M. (1990). Researching Lived Experience: Human Science for an Action Sensitive Pedagogy. State University of New York Press. ISBN: 978-0791404645
別名	photo-elicitation hermeneutic phenomenology, visual-method hermeneutic phenomenology, image-based hermeneutic phenomenology, VEHP	hermeneutic phenomenology, van Manen phenomenology, Heideggerian phenomenology, interpretive phenomenological inquiry
関連	4	5
概要	Visual elicitation hermeneutic phenomenology is a qualitative design that combines the image-based interview technique of visual elicitation with the interpretive, context-sensitive tradition of hermeneutic phenomenology. Participants produce or select photographs, drawings, or other images related to a lived experience; those images then anchor an in-depth interview in which meaning is co-constructed between researcher and participant. The approach draws on van Manen's hermeneutic phenomenology and Harper's photo-elicitation method to access layers of experiential meaning that words alone often cannot reach.	Interpretive phenomenology is a qualitative research design that investigates the meaning people attribute to their lived experiences by combining phenomenological description with hermeneutic interpretation. Rooted in Heidegger's ontology and systematised for social and human sciences by Max van Manen, it moves beyond description to ask what an experience means within a person's broader lifeworld, cultural context, and situated understanding. The researcher's own interpretive horizon is treated as an analytical resource rather than a bias to eliminate.