手法を比較
選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。
| ビジュアル・エリシテーション言説分析（VEDA）× | ナラティブ分析× | |
|---|---|---|
| 分野 | 質的手法 | 質的手法 |
| 系統 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 提唱年≠ | Late 1990s–2000s (consolidation as a combined approach) | 1967 (foundational); 2008 (canonical handbook) |
| 提唱者≠ | Synthesised from photo-elicitation (Clark, 1969; Harper, 2002) and discourse analysis (Foucault; Fairclough) | Catherine Kohler Riessman (seminal synthesis, 2008); roots in Labov & Waletzky (1967) |
| 種類≠ | Qualitative combined method | Qualitative interpretive method |
| 原典≠ | Harper, D. (2002). Talking about pictures: A case for photo elicitation. Visual Studies, 17(1), 13–26. DOI ↗ | Riessman, C.K. (2008). Narrative Methods for the Human Sciences. Sage. link ↗ |
| 別名 | VEDA, photo-elicitation discourse analysis, image-elicitation discourse analysis, visual elicitation interview analysis | narrative inquiry, life history analysis, biographical research, Anlatı Analizi (Narrative Analysis) |
| 関連≠ | 5 | 6 |
| 概要≠ | Visual Elicitation Discourse Analysis (VEDA) is a qualitative method that uses photographs or other images as interview stimuli to generate participant talk, which is then subjected to systematic discourse analysis. By anchoring conversation in concrete visual materials, VEDA accesses meanings, ideologies, and subject positions that purely verbal questioning often fails to surface. The approach combines the depth of elicitation interviewing with the critical, language-focused rigour of discourse analysis. | Narrative analysis is a qualitative research method, synthesised canonically by Catherine Kohler Riessman (2008), that examines how individuals storise their lived experiences and construct meaning through the telling. Drawing on life history, biographical, and narrative inquiry traditions, it treats the story itself — not just its content — as the unit of analysis, attending to temporal sequence, plot structure, and the social context in which a narrative is produced. |
| ScholarGateデータセット ↗ |
|
|