手法を比較
選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。
| VRAG:暴力リスク評価ガイド× | SAPROF: 暴力リスク評価のための保護要因構造化評価× | |
|---|---|---|
| 分野 | 司法心理学 | 司法心理学 |
| 系統 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 提唱年≠ | 1993 | 2012 |
| 提唱者≠ | Grant T. Harris, Marnie E. Rice, Vernon L. Quinsey | Vivienne de Vogel, Corine de Ruiter, Yvonne Bouman, Merike de Vries Robbé |
| 種類≠ | Clinician-rated / File-based | Clinician-rated |
| 原典≠ | Harris, G. T., Rice, M. E., & Quinsey, V. L. (1993). Violent recidivism of mentally disordered offenders: The development of a statistical prediction instrument. Neuropsychiatry Neuropsychology and Behavioral Neurology, 6(4), 269–279. DOI ↗ | de Vogel, V., de Ruiter, C., Bouman, Y., & de Vries Robbé, M. (2012). SAPROF: Structured Assessment of Protective Factors for violence risk (Version 3). Forum Educatief. link ↗ |
| 別名 | VRAG, Harris-Rice-Quinsey VRAG | SAPROF, de Vogel SAPROF |
| 関連 | 4 | 4 |
| 概要≠ | The Violence Risk Appraisal Guide (VRAG) is an actuarial instrument developed by Harris, Rice, and Quinsey (1993) to estimate the probability of violent recidivism among adult male offenders released from forensic psychiatric hospitals. It represents one of the earliest empirically validated violence prediction tools and remains widely used in correctional, forensic psychiatric, and civil commitment settings. The VRAG combines static historical variables with dynamic factors to generate a probability-based risk assessment. | The Structured Assessment of Protective Factors for Violence Risk (SAPROF) is a 17-item structured professional judgment tool developed by de Vogel, de Ruiter, Bouman, and colleagues (2012) to identify protective factors and strengths in individuals undergoing violence risk assessment. It complements risk assessment instruments (e.g., HCR-20v3) by systematically evaluating resilience, social support, motivation, and positive functioning—domains that mitigate violence risk and inform rehabilitation potential. |
| ScholarGateデータセット ↗ |
|
|