ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

使用痕跡分析×セラミック岩相学×
分野考古学考古学
系統Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
提唱年19801976
提唱者Lawrence KeeleyPeter Stimmung
種類Tool function inferenceClay and temper sourcing
原典Keeley, L. H. (1980). Experimental Determination of Stone Tool Uses. University of Chicago Press. link ↗Quinn, P. S. (2013). Ceramic Petrology: The Interpretation of Ceramic Artifacts in Archaeological Science. Archaeopress. link ↗
別名microwear, tool use analysisceramic thin section analysis, pottery petrography
関連44
概要Use-wear analysis (also called microwear or tool-use analysis) is a method that infers the function of stone tools from microscopic wear patterns on their cutting edges and surfaces. Pioneered by Lawrence Keeley in the 1970s-1980s, this technique examines damage patterns, polishes, and edge rounding produced as tools contact different materials during use. By analyzing these wear patterns, archaeologists can determine whether a tool was used to cut plant material, meat, bone, hide, or wood—revealing detailed information about task specialization and subsistence practices in prehistoric societies.Ceramic petrography analyzes pottery through microscopic examination of thin sections cut from pottery sherds. This method determines clay sources, identifies non-plastic inclusions (temper), and reconstructs pottery production technology. Pioneered by Peter Stimmung and others, ceramic petrography reveals whether pottery was made locally or imported, and whether specific production groups or workshops created vessels with distinctive raw material recipes.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 3 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Use-Wear Analysis · Ceramic Petrography. 2026-06-18に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare