ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

時間スライス・マッピングレビュー×スコーピングレビュー×
分野科学計量学科学計量学
系統Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
提唱年2000s–2010s2005
提唱者Campbell Collaboration / Gough, Oliver & ThomasHilary Arksey & Lisa O'Malley
種類Evidence synthesis with temporal segmentationEvidence synthesis review design
原典Gough, D., Oliver, S., & Thomas, J. (2012). An Introduction to Systematic Reviews. Sage Publications. ISBN: 978-1849204842Arksey, H., & O'Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32. DOI ↗
別名temporal mapping review, time-period mapping review, longitudinal evidence map, chronological mapping reviewscoping study, literature scoping, evidence mapping review, rapid evidence map
関連66
概要A time-sliced mapping review is a systematic evidence synthesis that partitions the search period into discrete temporal segments — such as five-year intervals — and constructs a separate evidence map for each slice. By comparing maps across periods, researchers can chart how topics emerge, peak, decline, or transform within a research field, producing a longitudinal picture of knowledge structure that a single-point mapping review cannot provide.A scoping review is a systematic evidence-synthesis method that maps the breadth and nature of research on a topic — identifying key concepts, evidence types, and gaps — without necessarily appraising study quality or pooling effect sizes. Developed by Arksey and O'Malley (2005) and refined by Levac and colleagues (2010), it is particularly valuable for emerging or heterogeneous fields where a full systematic review would be premature or infeasible.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Time-sliced Mapping review · Scoping Review. 2026-06-19に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare