手法を比較
選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。
| 時間スライス・マッピングレビュー× | 書誌計量分析× | |
|---|---|---|
| 分野 | 科学計量学 | 科学計量学 |
| 系統 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 提唱年≠ | 2000s–2010s | 1969 (term coined); practice dates to 1920s–1930s |
| 提唱者≠ | Campbell Collaboration / Gough, Oliver & Thomas | Alan Pritchard (coined term); earlier quantitative work by Paul Otlet (1934) and S. C. Bradford (1934) |
| 種類≠ | Evidence synthesis with temporal segmentation | Quantitative literature analysis |
| 原典≠ | Gough, D., Oliver, S., & Thomas, J. (2012). An Introduction to Systematic Reviews. Sage Publications. ISBN: 978-1849204842 | Pritchard, A. (1969). Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics? Journal of Documentation, 25(4), 348–349. link ↗ |
| 別名 | temporal mapping review, time-period mapping review, longitudinal evidence map, chronological mapping review | bibliometrics, bibliometric study, bibliometric mapping, publication analysis |
| 関連 | 6 | 6 |
| 概要≠ | A time-sliced mapping review is a systematic evidence synthesis that partitions the search period into discrete temporal segments — such as five-year intervals — and constructs a separate evidence map for each slice. By comparing maps across periods, researchers can chart how topics emerge, peak, decline, or transform within a research field, producing a longitudinal picture of knowledge structure that a single-point mapping review cannot provide. | Bibliometric analysis applies statistical and mathematical methods to bibliographic records — publications, citations, authors, journals, and keywords — to measure and map the structure, output, and intellectual evolution of a research field. It is widely used to identify influential works, prolific authors, productive journals, collaboration networks, and emerging research themes across any academic discipline. |
| ScholarGateデータセット ↗ |
|
|