手法を比較
選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。
| テクスト批評 ― 正統的なテクストの再構築と確立× | 談話分析× | |
|---|---|---|
| 分野≠ | フィールド調査法 | 質的研究 |
| 系統 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 提唱年≠ | Antiquity; modern systematic method c. 1850s (Lachmann) | 1989 (Fairclough); 1987 (Potter & Wetherell) |
| 提唱者≠ | Classical philologists (Karl Lachmann foremost in systematic method) | Norman Fairclough; Jonathan Potter and Margaret Wetherell |
| 種類≠ | Humanistic / philological research method | Method |
| 原典≠ | West, M. L. (1973). Textual Criticism and Editorial Technique Applicable to Greek and Latin Texts. Teubner. ISBN: 978-3519074014 | Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Longman. link ↗ |
| 別名≠ | lower criticism, editorial criticism, philological criticism, manuscript criticism | DA, Critical Discourse Analysis, Discursive Analysis |
| 関連≠ | 5 | 2 |
| 概要≠ | Textual criticism is a systematic philological method for identifying, comparing, and evaluating variant readings across multiple manuscript or print witnesses of a text in order to reconstruct the most accurate version of the original — or the author's intended — text. Applied since antiquity to classical, biblical, and literary works, it remains the foundational editorial method in classical studies, biblical scholarship, medieval studies, and critical editing of literary works. | Discourse analysis is a qualitative research methodology that examines how language, communication, and power shape meaning, identity, and social reality. Developed across linguistics, sociology, and psychology (particularly by Norman Fairclough and Jonathan Potter), discourse analysis goes beyond content to analyze language use as a social practice that constitutes and reflects power relations, ideologies, and social structures. |
| ScholarGateデータセット ↗ |
|
|