ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

テクスト批評 ― 正統的なテクストの再構築と確立×談話分析×
分野フィールド調査法質的研究
系統Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
提唱年Antiquity; modern systematic method c. 1850s (Lachmann)1989 (Fairclough); 1987 (Potter & Wetherell)
提唱者Classical philologists (Karl Lachmann foremost in systematic method)Norman Fairclough; Jonathan Potter and Margaret Wetherell
種類Humanistic / philological research methodMethod
原典West, M. L. (1973). Textual Criticism and Editorial Technique Applicable to Greek and Latin Texts. Teubner. ISBN: 978-3519074014Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Longman. link ↗
別名lower criticism, editorial criticism, philological criticism, manuscript criticismDA, Critical Discourse Analysis, Discursive Analysis
関連52
概要Textual criticism is a systematic philological method for identifying, comparing, and evaluating variant readings across multiple manuscript or print witnesses of a text in order to reconstruct the most accurate version of the original — or the author's intended — text. Applied since antiquity to classical, biblical, and literary works, it remains the foundational editorial method in classical studies, biblical scholarship, medieval studies, and critical editing of literary works.Discourse analysis is a qualitative research methodology that examines how language, communication, and power shape meaning, identity, and social reality. Developed across linguistics, sociology, and psychology (particularly by Norman Fairclough and Jonathan Potter), discourse analysis goes beyond content to analyze language use as a social practice that constitutes and reflects power relations, ideologies, and social structures.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Textual Criticism · Discourse Analysis. 2026-06-18に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare