手法を比較
選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。
| TeamSTEPPS Teamwork Perceptions Questionnaire× | ヘルスケアチーム活力尺度× | |
|---|---|---|
| 分野 | 医療経営学 | 医療経営学 |
| 系統 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 提唱年≠ | 2008 | 2015 |
| 提唱者≠ | Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), Department of Defense, and team members from the TeamSTEPPS program | Metersky, M. L., and colleagues; based on organizational team cohesion research |
| 種類 | Self-report | Self-report |
| 原典≠ | Sorra, J., Nieva, V. F., Famolaro, T., & Dyer, N. (2014). Detailed Evaluation of the Psychometric Properties of the Teamwork Perceptions Questionnaire. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Technical Report. link ↗ | Metersky, M. L., Garman, A., Li, X., & Teplitsky, M. (2015). Cohesion and teamwork in the ICU: Validation of the Health Care Team Vital Instrument. American Journal of Medical Quality, 30(1), 44–52. link ↗ |
| 別名≠ | T-TPQ, TeamSTEPPS TPQ | HTVI |
| 関連 | 4 | 4 |
| 概要≠ | The TeamSTEPPS Teamwork Perceptions Questionnaire (T-TPQ) is a 35-item self-report instrument designed to measure team members' perceptions of teamwork and communication in clinical units. Developed by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and the Department of Defense, the T-TPQ was created specifically to evaluate the impact of TeamSTEPPS (Team Strategies and Tools to Enhance Performance and Patient Safety) training on teamwork behaviors and safety outcomes. The questionnaire assesses five core domains of teamwork: team structure, leadership, situational monitoring, mutual support, and communication. | The Healthcare Team Vitality Instrument (HTVI) is a brief, 5-item survey designed to measure healthcare team cohesion, communication quality, and shared purpose—dimensions of team "vitality" that are associated with effective teamwork and patient safety. Developed by Metersky and colleagues and validated in intensive care units and surgical units, the HTVI assesses whether team members perceive themselves as a cohesive unit with clear goals, good communication, and mutual respect. The instrument is particularly valued for its brevity (takes <2 minutes) and its ability to rapidly assess team dynamics in clinical settings where administrative burden is a barrier to survey completion. |
| ScholarGateデータセット ↗ |
|
|