ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

スウィング・ウェイティング×二段階正規化を考慮した代替順位付け手法×
分野意思決定意思決定
系統MCDMMCDM
提唱年19862022
提唱者von Winterfeldt, D., Edwards, W.Zdravković, M., Hamid, M., Radovanović, M.
種類Weight_Subjective (swing from worst to best, relative gain assessment)Two-step normalisation (linear + vector) with weighted power aggregation
原典von Winterfeldt, D., Edwards, W. (1986). Decision Analysis and Behavioral Research. Cambridge University Press ISBN: 978-0521271073Zdravković, M., Hamid, M., Radovanović, M. (2022). AROMAN — Alternative Ranking Order Method Accounting for Two-Step Normalisation. Journal of Computational Design and Engineering link ↗
別名
関連88
概要SWING (Swing Weighting — importance weights derived from worst-to-best swing utility gains) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by von Winterfeldt, D., Edwards, W. in 1986. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.AROMAN (Alternative Ranking Order Method Accounting for Two-Step Normalisation) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zdravković, M., Hamid, M., Radovanović, M. in 2022. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 1 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: SWING · AROMAN. 2026-06-17に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare