ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

Structural Equivalence×Blockmodeling×Homophily Analysis×ソーシャルネットワーク分析×
分野SociologySociologySociologyネットワーク分析
系統Process / pipelineProcess / pipelineProcess / pipelineMachine learning
提唱年197119761954 (concept); 2001 (synthesis)1934 (sociometry); 1994 (modern formalization)
提唱者François Lorrain & Harrison WhiteHarrison White, Scott Boorman & Ronald BreigerLazarsfeld & Merton (concept); McPherson, Smith-Lovin & Cook (synthesis)Moreno, J.L.; formalized by Wasserman & Faust
種類Equivalence relation grouping actors with identical tie patternsNetwork partitioning into positions and a reduced role structureMeasurement of similarity-based tie formationStructural/relational analysis framework
原典Lorrain, F., & White, H. C. (1971). Structural equivalence of individuals in social networks. The Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 1(1), 49–80. DOI ↗White, H. C., Boorman, S. A., & Breiger, R. L. (1976). Social structure from multiple networks. I. Blockmodels of roles and positions. American Journal of Sociology, 81(4), 730–780. DOI ↗McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415–444. DOI ↗Wasserman, S. & Faust, K. (1994). Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 978-0-521-38707-1
別名structural equivalence analysis, positional equivalence, Euclidean equivalence of actors, equivalence classesblock modeling, blockmodel analysis, generalized blockmodeling, CONCORhomophily measurement, assortative mixing analysis, birds-of-a-feather analysis, tie-similarity analysisSNA, network analysis, sociometric analysis, relational analysis
関連5445
概要Structural equivalence identifies actors who occupy the same position in a network because they have identical ties to identical others. Defined by François Lorrain and Harrison White in 1971, it formalizes the idea that two people are interchangeable in the social structure when they relate to exactly the same set of third parties, and it provides the foundation for partitioning networks into positions and building blockmodels.Blockmodeling is a family of methods that simplify a social network by partitioning its actors into positions — groups of actors who are equivalent in their pattern of ties — and summarizing the relations between positions as a compact image, or reduced role structure. Introduced by Harrison White, Scott Boorman, and Ronald Breiger in 1976, it shifts attention from individuals to the structural roles they occupy.Homophily analysis quantifies the tendency of similar individuals to form ties — the principle that 'birds of a feather flock together'. It compares the rate at which people connect with others who share an attribute (race, gender, age, education, attitudes) against what would be expected by chance, distinguishing the homophily that arises merely from group sizes from the genuine, behavior-driven preference for similar others.Social Network Analysis (SNA) is a structural method that maps and measures relationships and flows between people, groups, organizations, or other entities modeled as nodes connected by ties (edges). Rather than focusing on individual attributes, SNA reveals how the pattern of connections shapes behavior, influence, information flow, and outcomes within a system.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Structural Equivalence · Blockmodeling · Homophily Analysis · Social Network Analysis. 2026-06-24に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare