ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

Structural Balance Theory×Dyadic Analysis×Homophily Analysis×
分野SociologySociologySociology
系統Process / pipelineRegression modelProcess / pipeline
提唱年1946 (Heider); 1956 (Cartwright & Harary)19811954 (concept); 2001 (synthesis)
提唱者Fritz Heider; formalized by Dorwin Cartwright & Frank HararyHolland & Leinhardt (p1); Kenny (Social Relations Model)Lazarsfeld & Merton (concept); McPherson, Smith-Lovin & Cook (synthesis)
種類Theory and graph-theoretic test for tension in signed relationshipsAnalysis of the dyad as the unit, decomposing relational effectsMeasurement of similarity-based tie formation
原典Cartwright, D., & Harary, F. (1956). Structural balance: a generalization of Heider's theory. Psychological Review, 63(5), 277–293. DOI ↗Holland, P. W., & Leinhardt, S. (1981). An exponential family of probability distributions for directed graphs. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 76(373), 33–50. DOI ↗McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415–444. DOI ↗
別名balance theory, Heider balance, signed network balance, structural balance analysisdyad analysis, dyadic data analysis, social relations model, dyad censushomophily measurement, assortative mixing analysis, birds-of-a-feather analysis, tie-similarity analysis
関連544
概要Structural balance theory analyzes networks whose ties carry a sign — positive for liking, alliance, or trust, negative for hostility or distrust — and asks which configurations are psychologically and socially stable. Originating in Fritz Heider's cognitive balance principle and given a graph-theoretic form by Dorwin Cartwright and Frank Harary in 1956, it predicts that signed networks evolve toward states free of the tension produced by inconsistent triads such as 'the friend of my enemy'.Dyadic analysis treats the dyad — the pair of actors and the relation between them — as the unit of analysis, separating the relational outcome into what each actor brings to all their relationships and what is unique to the specific pair. It spans the descriptive dyad census of network analysis and statistical frameworks such as Holland and Leinhardt's p1 model and Kenny's Social Relations Model, all of which respect the structural non-independence inherent in relational data.Homophily analysis quantifies the tendency of similar individuals to form ties — the principle that 'birds of a feather flock together'. It compares the rate at which people connect with others who share an attribute (race, gender, age, education, attitudes) against what would be expected by chance, distinguishing the homophily that arises merely from group sizes from the genuine, behavior-driven preference for similar others.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Structural Balance Theory · Dyadic Analysis · Homophily Analysis. 2026-06-25に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare