ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

Stakeholder Analysis for Development×Logical Framework Approach×
分野Development StudiesDevelopment Studies
系統Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
提唱年19971969
提唱者Robin Grimble & Kate Wellard; Mark Reed and colleaguesLeon Rosenberg / Practical Concepts Inc. for USAID; later NORAD, GTZ, European Commission
種類Analytical method for identifying and characterising actorsProject planning, monitoring and evaluation framework
原典Reed, M. S., Graves, A., Dandy, N., Posthumus, H., Hubacek, K., Morris, J., Prell, C., Quinn, C. H., & Stringer, L. C. (2009). Who's in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(5), 1933-1949. DOI ↗NORAD (1999). The Logical Framework Approach (LFA): Handbook for Objectives-Oriented Planning (4th ed.). Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation, Oslo. link ↗
別名Stakeholder mapping, Power-interest analysis, Actor analysis, Influence-importance matrixLogframe, LFA, Logical Framework Matrix, Objectives-Oriented Planning
関連44
概要Stakeholder analysis in development is a structured method for identifying the actors with a stake in an intervention and characterising their interests, power, and influence, so that programmes can be designed and implemented with a clear view of whom they affect and who can affect them. Drawing on the natural-resource-management tradition of Robin Grimble and Kate Wellard and the methodological typology of Mark Reed and colleagues, it employs tools such as the power-interest grid, the influence-importance matrix, and Venn diagrams to make the social landscape of a project explicit.The Logical Framework Approach (Logframe) is a structured planning, monitoring, and evaluation method that distils an intervention into a single four-by-four matrix linking a hierarchy of objectives to the indicators, evidence, and external conditions on which success depends. Originated by Leon Rosenberg of Practical Concepts Incorporated for USAID in 1969 and elaborated by agencies such as GTZ, NORAD, and the European Commission, it forces planners to make explicit the causal logic by which activities are expected to produce outputs, outcomes, and ultimately a development goal.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Stakeholder Analysis for Development · Logical Framework Approach. 2026-06-24に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare