ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

Speech Act Analysis×批判的談話分析×
分野言語学質的手法
系統Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
提唱年1962Late 1970s–1990s (systematised ~1979–1995)
提唱者J. L. Austin and John R. Searle (analytic method derived from speech act theory)Norman Fairclough; Teun A. van Dijk; Ruth Wodak
種類Qualitative pragmatic coding of utterances for illocutionary forceQualitative research method
原典Austin, J. L. (1962). How to Do Things with Words. Oxford University Press. ISBN: 9780198245537Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and Social Change. Polity Press. link ↗
別名Illocutionary Force Analysis, Speech Act Coding, Pragmatic Act AnalysisCDA, Critical Linguistics, Discourse-Historical Approach, Dialectical-Relational Analysis
関連46
概要Speech act analysis is the empirical, qualitative method of examining real utterances for the actions they perform — promising, requesting, apologizing, warning, declaring — rather than merely for what they describe. Building on J. L. Austin's insight that saying is doing and on John Searle's systematic taxonomy of illocutionary acts, the analyst segments discourse into utterances, identifies the illocutionary force of each, classifies it (as a representative, directive, commissive, expressive, or declaration), and notes whether the act is performed directly or indirectly. It turns the philosophy of language into a coding procedure that can be applied to conversations, written texts, and elicited data.Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) is a qualitative method that examines how language in texts and talk constructs, sustains, and challenges relations of power, ideology, and social inequality. Drawing on linguistics, social theory, and critical philosophy, CDA treats discourse not merely as communication but as social practice — a site where dominance is reproduced and where resistance can be articulated. Developed in the late twentieth century by Norman Fairclough, Teun van Dijk, and Ruth Wodak, among others, CDA is applied to political speeches, media texts, policy documents, educational materials, and institutional interactions.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 3 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Speech Act Analysis · Critical Discourse Analysis. 2026-06-25に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare