ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

空間的因果関係感応度分析×地理的に重み付けされた回帰分析 (GWR)×
分野因果推論空間分析
系統Regression modelRegression model
提唱年1988–2021 (developed progressively)2002
提唱者Anselin (1988) for spatial diagnostics; Reich et al. (2021) for spatial causal frameworksFotheringham, Brunsdon & Charlton
種類Sensitivity / robustness analysisLocal spatial regression
原典Anselin, L. (1988). Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht. ISBN: 978-9024737322Fotheringham, A. S., Brunsdon, C., & Charlton, M. (2002). Geographically Weighted Regression: The Analysis of Spatially Varying Relationships. Wiley. ISBN: 978-0471496168
別名spatial causal sensitivity, spatial robustness checks, SSAC, spatial confounding sensitivityGWR, local regression, spatially varying coefficient regression, Coğrafi Ağırlıklı Regresyon (GWR)
関連65
概要Spatial sensitivity analysis for causality systematically tests whether a causal estimate derived from georeferenced data holds up as spatial structure, spillovers, and the choice of spatial weights matrix are varied. Because nearby units often share unmeasured confounders — soil quality, local infrastructure, neighbourhood norms — a naive regression may yield biased causal estimates. This method reveals how fragile or robust a claimed causal effect is to alternative spatial specifications.Geographically Weighted Regression is a local regression method, introduced by Fotheringham, Brunsdon and Charlton (2002), that allows the regression coefficients to vary across space. Instead of one global equation, it fits a separate set of coefficients at every location, capturing spatial heterogeneity in the relationships.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Spatial Sensitivity Analysis for Causality · Geographically Weighted Regression. 2026-06-17に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare