手法を比較
選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。
| 空間的粗粒化厳密一致法（Spatial CEM）× | 差分の差 (Difference-in-Differences, DiD)× | |
|---|---|---|
| 分野≠ | 因果推論 | 計量経済学 |
| 系統 | Regression model | Regression model |
| 提唱年≠ | 2012 (CEM foundation); spatial extension in applied literature 2015-present | 1994 |
| 提唱者≠ | Iacus, King & Porro (CEM foundation, 2012); extended to spatial contexts by applied spatial econometricians | Card & Krueger (canonical 1994 application); Angrist & Pischke (textbook treatment) |
| 種類≠ | Quasi-experimental matching estimator with spatial covariates | Causal inference / panel regression |
| 原典≠ | Iacus, S. M., King, G., & Porro, G. (2012). Causal Inference without Balance Checking: Coarsened Exact Matching. Political Analysis, 20(1), 1-24. DOI ↗ | Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J.-S. (2009). Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist's Companion. Princeton University Press. ISBN: 978-0691120355 |
| 別名≠ | Spatial CEM, Geographic CEM, Spatial exact matching, CEM with spatial covariates | diff-in-diff, DiD, Farkların Farkı (Diff-in-Diff) |
| 関連≠ | 6 | 5 |
| 概要≠ | Spatial Coarsened Exact Matching applies the Coarsened Exact Matching framework to study designs involving geographic units — neighbourhoods, census tracts, municipalities, or grid cells. Covariates are coarsened into discrete bins and units are matched exactly on those bins, with spatial attributes (location, adjacency, geographic characteristics) incorporated as matching dimensions to control for spatial confounding. | Difference-in-Differences is a causal-inference method that estimates the effect of an intervention by comparing how a treatment group and a control group change over time. Made famous by Card and Krueger's 1994 minimum-wage study and developed in Angrist and Pischke's Mostly Harmless Econometrics, it isolates the treatment effect as the difference between the two groups' before-after changes. |
| ScholarGateデータセット ↗ |
|
|