ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

短縮版テスト再検査信頼性×確認的因子分析(CFA)×
分野心理測定学心理測定学
系統Latent structureLatent structure
提唱年1990s–2000s1969
提唱者Derived from classical test-retest reliability; short-form methodology formalised by Smith, McCarthy & Anderson (2000) among othersKarl Gustav Jöreskog
種類Reliability estimationHypothesis-testing latent variable model
原典Smith, G. T., McCarthy, D. M., & Anderson, K. G. (2000). On the sins of short-form development. Psychological Assessment, 12(1), 102–111. DOI ↗Jöreskog, K. G. (1969). A general approach to confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 34(2), 183–202. DOI ↗
別名abbreviated scale temporal stability, short-form temporal consistency, retest reliability of short forms, SF test-retestCFA, confirmatory FA, measurement model, restricted factor analysis
関連44
概要Short-form test-retest reliability quantifies how consistently an abbreviated version of a measurement instrument produces the same scores across two administrations separated by a defined time interval. It is a critical validation step whenever a full-length scale is shortened for practical use, confirming that item reduction has not degraded temporal stability.Confirmatory factor analysis tests a researcher-specified factor structure against observed data. Unlike exploratory approaches, the researcher decides in advance which indicators load on which latent factor, and the model is evaluated by how closely the implied covariance matrix reproduces the sample covariance matrix. CFA is central to scale validation, construct validity assessment, and measurement invariance testing.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Short-form test-retest reliability · Confirmatory factor analysis. 2026-06-18に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare