手法を比較
選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。
| 短縮版測定不変性× | 測定不変性テスト× | |
|---|---|---|
| 分野 | 心理測定学 | 心理測定学 |
| 系統 | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| 提唱年≠ | 2000s | 2000 |
| 提唱者≠ | Adapted from Vandenberg & Lance (2000) and Millsap & Kwok (2004) invariance framework applied to short-form scales | Vandenberg & Lance |
| 種類≠ | Measurement equivalence testing | Multi-group confirmatory factor analysis procedure |
| 原典≠ | Millsap, R. E., & Kwok, O. M. (2004). Evaluating the impact of partial factor loading and intercept invariance on selection in two populations. Psychological Methods, 9(1), 93–115. DOI ↗ | Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4–70. DOI ↗ |
| 別名 | SF-MI, abbreviated scale invariance, short-form factorial invariance, brief measure invariance | Factorial Invariance, Measurement Equivalence, Configural-Metric-Scalar Testing, Ölçüm Değişmezliği |
| 関連≠ | 6 | 3 |
| 概要≠ | Short form measurement invariance testing evaluates whether an abbreviated version of a psychological scale measures the same latent construct equivalently across groups or conditions. It applies the hierarchical multigroup confirmatory factor analysis invariance sequence — configural, metric, scalar, and strict — specifically to short-form instruments, ensuring that brevity does not introduce measurement bias when comparing subgroups. | Measurement invariance testing is a sequence of nested confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) models that examines whether a psychological scale measures the same latent construct in the same way across distinct groups or time points. Systematized and popularized by Vandenberg and Lance (2000), the procedure tests a hierarchy of constraints — from identical factor patterns to identical item intercepts — so that researchers can justify meaningful group comparisons on latent means. |
| ScholarGateデータセット ↗ |
|
|