手法を比較
選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。
| 短縮版項目機能差 (Short-Form DIF) 分析× | 短縮版測定不変性× | |
|---|---|---|
| 分野 | 心理測定学 | 心理測定学 |
| 系統 | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| 提唱年≠ | 1970s–1990s (DIF); short-form context developed in parallel with scale abbreviation literature | 2000s |
| 提唱者≠ | Angoff, W. H. and subsequent DIF methodologists | Adapted from Vandenberg & Lance (2000) and Millsap & Kwok (2004) invariance framework applied to short-form scales |
| 種類≠ | Item bias / measurement fairness analysis | Measurement equivalence testing |
| 原典≠ | Millsap, R. E. (2012). Statistical Approaches to Measurement Invariance. Routledge. ISBN: 978-0-8058-4507-0 | Millsap, R. E., & Kwok, O. M. (2004). Evaluating the impact of partial factor loading and intercept invariance on selection in two populations. Psychological Methods, 9(1), 93–115. DOI ↗ |
| 別名 | Short-form DIF, abbreviated scale DIF, DIF in short forms, short-scale DIF detection | SF-MI, abbreviated scale invariance, short-form factorial invariance, brief measure invariance |
| 関連 | 6 | 6 |
| 概要≠ | Short-form differential item functioning (DIF) analysis examines whether individual items in an abbreviated scale function equivalently across demographic or subgroup comparisons. When a scale is shortened, retained items must still behave fairly for all relevant groups — DIF analysis verifies this, ensuring that score differences reflect true ability or trait differences rather than item bias. | Short form measurement invariance testing evaluates whether an abbreviated version of a psychological scale measures the same latent construct equivalently across groups or conditions. It applies the hierarchical multigroup confirmatory factor analysis invariance sequence — configural, metric, scalar, and strict — specifically to short-form instruments, ensuring that brevity does not introduce measurement bias when comparing subgroups. |
| ScholarGateデータセット ↗ |
|
|