手法を比較
選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。
| 短縮版項目機能差 (Short-Form DIF) 分析× | 測定不変性テスト× | |
|---|---|---|
| 分野 | 心理測定学 | 心理測定学 |
| 系統 | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| 提唱年≠ | 1970s–1990s (DIF); short-form context developed in parallel with scale abbreviation literature | 2000 |
| 提唱者≠ | Angoff, W. H. and subsequent DIF methodologists | Vandenberg & Lance |
| 種類≠ | Item bias / measurement fairness analysis | Multi-group confirmatory factor analysis procedure |
| 原典≠ | Millsap, R. E. (2012). Statistical Approaches to Measurement Invariance. Routledge. ISBN: 978-0-8058-4507-0 | Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4–70. DOI ↗ |
| 別名 | Short-form DIF, abbreviated scale DIF, DIF in short forms, short-scale DIF detection | Factorial Invariance, Measurement Equivalence, Configural-Metric-Scalar Testing, Ölçüm Değişmezliği |
| 関連≠ | 6 | 3 |
| 概要≠ | Short-form differential item functioning (DIF) analysis examines whether individual items in an abbreviated scale function equivalently across demographic or subgroup comparisons. When a scale is shortened, retained items must still behave fairly for all relevant groups — DIF analysis verifies this, ensuring that score differences reflect true ability or trait differences rather than item bias. | Measurement invariance testing is a sequence of nested confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) models that examines whether a psychological scale measures the same latent construct in the same way across distinct groups or time points. Systematized and popularized by Vandenberg and Lance (2000), the procedure tests a hierarchy of constraints — from identical factor patterns to identical item intercepts — so that researchers can justify meaningful group comparisons on latent means. |
| ScholarGateデータセット ↗ |
|
|