ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

短縮版コンテンツ妥当性×ショートフォーム項目分析×
分野心理測定学心理測定学
系統Latent structureLatent structure
提唱年1995–20001990s–2000s
提唱者Messick (validity framework); Smith et al. (short-form standards)Psychometric tradition; methodological articulation by Smith, McCarthy & Anderson (2000)
種類Validity evaluationItem selection and evaluation procedure
原典Smith, G. T., McCarthy, D. M., & Anderson, K. G. (2000). On the sins of short-form development. Psychological Assessment, 12(1), 102–111. DOI ↗Smith, G. T., McCarthy, D. M., & Anderson, K. G. (2000). On the sins of short-form development. Psychological Assessment, 12(1), 102–111. DOI ↗
別名abbreviated scale content validity, short-scale content coverage, brief form content validity, content validity for short formsabbreviated scale item analysis, short-scale item evaluation, item screening for short forms, SFIA
関連64
概要Short-form content validity evaluates whether items retained in an abbreviated scale still adequately represent every substantive facet of the construct measured by the original full-length instrument. It ensures that shortening a scale does not hollow out the conceptual domain it was designed to cover.Short-form item analysis is the systematic psychometric evaluation and selection of items when constructing an abbreviated version of a longer measurement instrument. It applies classical and modern item-analysis criteria — item-total correlations, reliability estimates, and factor structure — to identify the smallest item subset that preserves the original scale's psychometric integrity.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Short form content validity · Short-form item analysis. 2026-06-18に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare