手法を比較
選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。
| ショートフォーム構成概念妥当性× | 短縮版信頼性分析× | |
|---|---|---|
| 分野 | 心理測定学 | 心理測定学 |
| 系統 | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| 提唱年 | 1990s–2000s | 1990s–2000s |
| 提唱者≠ | Multiple contributors; Smith, McCarthy, & Anderson (2000) formalized short-form validation criteria | Conventional practice; codified notably by Smith, McCarthy & Anderson (2000) and Stanton et al. (2002) |
| 種類≠ | Validity assessment / scale shortening | Scale development / psychometric evaluation |
| 原典≠ | Smith, G. T., McCarthy, D. M., & Anderson, K. G. (2000). On the sins of short-form development. Psychological Assessment, 12(1), 102–111. DOI ↗ | Stanton, J. M., Sinar, E. F., Balzer, W. K. & Smith, P. C. (2002). Issues and strategies for reducing the length of self-report scales. Personnel Psychology, 55(1), 167–194. DOI ↗ |
| 別名 | abbreviated scale construct validity, short-form scale validation, brief scale validity, short measure construct validation | abbreviated scale reliability, short-form validation, scale shortening, item reduction reliability |
| 関連 | 6 | 6 |
| 概要≠ | Short form construct validity is the systematic evaluation of whether an abbreviated version of a psychological scale still measures the same underlying construct as the original full-length instrument. It combines item selection procedures with confirmatory factor analysis, convergent and discriminant validity tests, and criterion-related evidence to demonstrate that scale shortening has not compromised the meaning of measurement. | Short-form reliability analysis evaluates whether an abbreviated version of a psychological scale maintains acceptable internal consistency, validity, and structural integrity after items are removed. It is used in survey and assessment research to create briefer instruments that reduce respondent burden without sacrificing measurement quality. |
| ScholarGateデータセット ↗ |
|
|