ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

ショートフォーム構成概念妥当性×短縮版信頼性分析×
分野心理測定学心理測定学
系統Latent structureLatent structure
提唱年1990s–2000s1990s–2000s
提唱者Multiple contributors; Smith, McCarthy, & Anderson (2000) formalized short-form validation criteriaConventional practice; codified notably by Smith, McCarthy & Anderson (2000) and Stanton et al. (2002)
種類Validity assessment / scale shorteningScale development / psychometric evaluation
原典Smith, G. T., McCarthy, D. M., & Anderson, K. G. (2000). On the sins of short-form development. Psychological Assessment, 12(1), 102–111. DOI ↗Stanton, J. M., Sinar, E. F., Balzer, W. K. & Smith, P. C. (2002). Issues and strategies for reducing the length of self-report scales. Personnel Psychology, 55(1), 167–194. DOI ↗
別名abbreviated scale construct validity, short-form scale validation, brief scale validity, short measure construct validationabbreviated scale reliability, short-form validation, scale shortening, item reduction reliability
関連66
概要Short form construct validity is the systematic evaluation of whether an abbreviated version of a psychological scale still measures the same underlying construct as the original full-length instrument. It combines item selection procedures with confirmatory factor analysis, convergent and discriminant validity tests, and criterion-related evidence to demonstrate that scale shortening has not compromised the meaning of measurement.Short-form reliability analysis evaluates whether an abbreviated version of a psychological scale maintains acceptable internal consistency, validity, and structural integrity after items are removed. It is used in survey and assessment research to create briefer instruments that reduce respondent burden without sacrificing measurement quality.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Short form construct validity · Short-form reliability analysis. 2026-06-17に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare