手法を比較
選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。
| 基準と代替案の同時評価× | 階層分析法× | |
|---|---|---|
| 分野 | 意思決定 | 意思決定 |
| 系統 | MCDM | MCDM |
| 提唱年≠ | 2018 | 1980 |
| 提唱者≠ | Keshavarz Ghorabaee, M., Amiri, M., Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z., Antucheviciene, J. | Saaty, T. L. |
| 種類≠ | Simultaneous weight derivation and ranking (objective optimisation) | Pairwise comparison (eigenvalue) |
| 原典≠ | Keshavarz Ghorabaee, M., Amiri, M., Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z., Antucheviciene, J. (2018). Simultaneous evaluation of criteria and alternatives (SECA) for multi-criteria decision-making. Informatica DOI ↗ | Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York ISBN: 978-0070543713 |
| 別名 | — | — |
| 関連 | 8 | 8 |
| 概要≠ | SECA (Simultaneous Evaluation of Criteria and Alternatives) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Keshavarz Ghorabaee, M., Amiri, M., Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z., Antucheviciene, J. in 2018. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saaty, T. L. in 1980. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGateデータセット ↗ |
|
|