ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

シアトル労作性狭心症質問票 (SAQ)×ニューヨーク心臓協会(NYHA)機能分類×
分野循環器学循環器学
系統Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
提唱年19951994
提唱者John A. SpertusNew York Heart Association
種類Self-report questionnaireOrdinal clinician-assessment classification system
原典Spertus, J. A., Winder, J. A., Dewhurst, T. A., Deyo, R. A., Prodzinski, J., McDonell, M., & Fihn, S. D. (1995). Development and evaluation of a health-related quality of life measure for men with erectile dysfunction. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 25(2), 149–155. link ↗The Criteria Committee of the New York Heart Association. (1994). Nomenclature and Criteria for Diagnosis of Diseases of the Heart and Great Vessels (9th ed.). Little, Brown and Company. link ↗
別名SAQNYHA, NYHA Class, Functional Classification
関連44
概要The Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) is a 19-item self-report measure that evaluates the frequency and severity of angina symptoms, functional limitations, and disease-specific quality of life in patients with coronary artery disease. Developed by Spertus and colleagues in 1995, the SAQ has become the gold-standard symptom-specific QoL instrument in cardiology and is recommended by major guidelines for assessing angina burden and treatment response.The New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Classification is a four-category ordinal system for grading heart failure severity based on the level of physical activity that precipitates dyspnea or other HF symptoms. Established by the NYHA in 1928 and refined in 1994, the NYHA classification is the oldest and most widely used functional status metric in cardiology, providing a simple, clinically intuitive framework for describing HF symptom burden, guiding treatment intensity, and predicting prognosis.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 1 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Seattle Angina Questionnaire · New York Heart Association Functional Classification. 2026-06-20に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare