ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

ROUGH-MABAC×基準相互相関による基準重要度 (CRITIC)×
分野意思決定意思決定
系統MCDMMCDM
提唱年20191995
提唱者Jia, F., Liu, Y., Wang, X.Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L.
種類IF-Rough outranking/ranking — Intuitionistic Fuzzy Rough Number (membership μ, non-membership ν)Statistical contrast intensity + correlation-based objective weighting
原典Jia, F., Liu, Y., Wang, X. (2019). An extended MABAC method for multi-criteria group decision making based on intuitionistic fuzzy rough numbers. Expert Systems with Applications DOI ↗Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. (1995). Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The CRITIC method. Computers & Operations Research DOI ↗
別名
関連88
概要ROUGH-MABAC (Rough-MABAC — Rough extension of MABAC) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Jia, F., Liu, Y., Wang, X. in 2019. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.CRITIC (CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. in 1995. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 1 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: ROUGH-MABAC · CRITIC. 2026-06-17に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare