手法を比較
選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。
| 堅牢な根本原因分析× | 故障モード影響解析 (FMEA)× | |
|---|---|---|
| 分野 | 実験計画法 | 実験計画法 |
| 系統 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 提唱年≠ | 1990s–2000s | 1949 (military); widespread industrial adoption 1970s–1980s |
| 提唱者≠ | Synthesised from RCA practice (Kepner-Tregoe, 1960s) and Taguchi robustness principles (1980s–1990s) | U.S. Military / NASA (formalized by MIL-P-1629, 1949) |
| 種類≠ | Hybrid quality-engineering diagnostic method | Proactive risk analysis technique |
| 原典≠ | Andersen, B., & Fagerhaug, T. (2006). Root Cause Analysis: Simplified Tools and Techniques (2nd ed.). ASQ Quality Press. ISBN: 978-0873896924 | Stamatis, D. H. (2003). Failure Mode and Effect Analysis: FMEA from Theory to Execution (2nd ed.). ASQ Quality Press. ISBN: 978-0873895989 |
| 別名≠ | Robust RCA, Robustness-Integrated Root Cause Analysis, RRCA | FMEA, Failure Modes and Effects Analysis, FMECA, Failure Mode Effects and Criticality Analysis |
| 関連 | 6 | 6 |
| 概要≠ | Robust Root Cause Analysis (Robust RCA) integrates classical root cause investigation techniques — such as the 5-Whys, Ishikawa diagrams, and fault trees — with Taguchi's robustness thinking to identify not only the primary cause of a failure but also the noise factors and variability sources that allow the failure to occur repeatedly. The result is corrective actions that eliminate the root cause and make the system inherently insensitive to future variation. | Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) is a structured, proactive risk management technique used to identify potential failure modes in a system, process, or product design, evaluate their consequences, and prioritize corrective actions before failures occur. Originally developed for the U.S. military in 1949 and later adopted by NASA, automotive, and manufacturing industries, FMEA is now a cornerstone quality-engineering tool embedded in standards such as AIAG-VDA and ISO 9001-aligned processes. |
| ScholarGateデータセット ↗ |
|
|