手法を比較

	ロバストなヌソロジカル妥当性	判別妥当性
分野	心理測定学	心理測定学
系統	Latent structure	Latent structure
提唱年	1955	1959
提唱者	Cronbach & Meehl (seminal framework); later extended by Shadish, Cook, and Campbell	Donald T. Campbell and Donald W. Fiske
種類	Validity assessment / construct validation	Validity evidence / psychometric evaluation
原典	Cronbach, L. J. & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302.	Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–105.
別名	nomological network validity, robust validity testing, nomological validity, RNV	discriminant validity evidence, divergent validity, DV, AVE-based discriminant validity
関連	5	5
概要	Robust nomological validity evaluates whether a psychological construct relates to theoretically expected variables in the predicted directions, using statistically robust estimation methods that remain trustworthy when distributional assumptions are violated. It tests the construct's place within its nomological network — the web of theoretical relationships that define its meaning.	Discriminant validity is evidence that a latent construct is empirically distinct from other constructs it should differ from. Originating in Campbell and Fiske's multitrait-multimethod framework (1959), it is a core component of construct validity and a mandatory check in scale development and structural equation modeling.