手法を比較
選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。
| ロバスト勾配ブースティング× | 正則化勾配ブースティング× | |
|---|---|---|
| 分野 | 機械学習 | 機械学習 |
| 系統 | Machine learning | Machine learning |
| 提唱年≠ | 2001 | 2001 (gradient boosting); 2016 (explicit L1/L2 regularization in XGBoost) |
| 提唱者≠ | Friedman, J. H. (with Huber loss from Huber, P. J.) | Chen, T. & Guestrin, C. (building on Friedman, J. H.) |
| 種類≠ | Ensemble (boosted trees with robust loss) | Regularized ensemble (additive tree model) |
| 原典≠ | Friedman, J. H. (2001). Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine. Annals of Statistics, 29(5), 1189–1232. DOI ↗ | Chen, T. & Guestrin, C. (2016). XGBoost: A scalable tree boosting system. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 785–794. DOI ↗ |
| 別名 | gradient boosting with Huber loss, robust GBM, outlier-robust boosting, robust gradient-boosted trees | penalized gradient boosting, shrinkage-regularized boosting, XGBoost-style regularization, L1/L2 gradient boosting |
| 関連 | 6 | 6 |
| 概要≠ | Robust Gradient Boosting is gradient boosting trained with outlier-resistant loss functions — most commonly the Huber loss or quantile (pinball) loss — instead of squared-error loss. Proposed in Friedman's seminal 2001 paper, this variant produces predictions far less distorted by extreme values or contaminated labels, while retaining the full predictive power of gradient-boosted trees. | Regularized gradient boosting extends the classic additive tree ensemble (Friedman 2001) by embedding L1 and L2 penalty terms directly into the training objective, along with a complexity penalty on tree size. Popularized by XGBoost (Chen & Guestrin 2016), this framework reduces overfitting and improves generalization compared to unpenalized boosting, while retaining the method's characteristic accuracy on tabular data. |
| ScholarGateデータセット ↗ |
|
|