手法を比較
選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。
| 頑健な内容妥当性評価× | 収束的妥当性× | |
|---|---|---|
| 分野 | 心理測定学 | 心理測定学 |
| 系統 | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| 提唱年≠ | 1975 (base); 2000s–2010s (robust extensions) | 1959 |
| 提唱者≠ | Grounded in Lawshe (1975) CVR framework; robust extensions draw on Huber, Wilcox, and robust statistics tradition | Donald T. Campbell & Donald W. Fiske |
| 種類≠ | Validity evidence / expert judgement procedure with outlier-resistant aggregation | Validity evidence / construct validation |
| 原典≠ | Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 563–575. link ↗ | Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–105. DOI ↗ |
| 別名≠ | robust CVR, outlier-resistant content validity, robust content validity index, robust expert-panel validation | convergent construct validity, convergence validity, AVE-based convergent validity |
| 関連≠ | 6 | 4 |
| 概要≠ | Robust content validity assessment applies outlier-resistant statistical methods to the aggregation of expert panel ratings in content validation studies. By detecting and down-weighting idiosyncratic or extreme rater judgements, it yields Content Validity Ratio (CVR) and Content Validity Index (CVI) estimates that reflect the consensus of the panel more accurately than standard averaging when one or a few raters deviate sharply from the group. | Convergent validity is the degree to which multiple indicators that are theoretically expected to measure the same construct actually correlate with one another. It is one of the two complementary forms of construct validity identified by Campbell and Fiske (1959) and is now routinely assessed via factor loadings and the Average Variance Extracted (AVE) statistic in SEM-based scale validation. |
| ScholarGateデータセット ↗ |
|
|