手法を比較
選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。
| ロバスト因果影響分析× | 因果推論における感度分析× | |
|---|---|---|
| 分野 | 因果推論 | 因果推論 |
| 系統 | Regression model | Regression model |
| 提唱年≠ | 2015 | 1983–2002 |
| 提唱者≠ | Brodersen, Gallusser, Koehler, Remy & Scott (foundational CausalImpact framework) | Paul R. Rosenbaum (hidden-bias framework); extended by Cinelli & Hazlett (omitted-variable approach) |
| 種類≠ | Bayesian causal inference with robustness validation | Diagnostic / robustness check |
| 原典≠ | Brodersen, K. H., Gallusser, F., Koehler, J., Remy, N., & Scott, S. L. (2015). Inferring causal impact using Bayesian structural time-series models. Annals of Applied Statistics, 9(1), 247-274. DOI ↗ | Rosenbaum, P. R. (2002). Observational Studies (2nd ed.). Springer. ISBN: 978-0387989679 |
| 別名 | robust CausalImpact, sensitivity-augmented causal impact, causal impact with robustness checks, robust BSTS causal inference | sensitivity analysis, hidden-bias sensitivity analysis, Rosenbaum sensitivity analysis, omitted-variable sensitivity |
| 関連≠ | 5 | 4 |
| 概要≠ | Robust Causal Impact Analysis extends the Bayesian structural time-series CausalImpact framework (Brodersen et al., 2015) by embedding systematic robustness checks — in-time placebo tests, in-space placebo controls, covariate sensitivity analysis, and prior sensitivity assessments — to verify that a detected intervention effect is genuine and not an artifact of model choices or coincidental data patterns. | Sensitivity analysis for causality assesses how robust a causal conclusion is to unobserved confounding. Rather than assuming all confounders are controlled, it asks: how strong would an unmeasured variable need to be to overturn the estimated effect? It is an indispensable robustness check after any quasi-experimental or observational causal analysis. |
| ScholarGateデータセット ↗ |
|
|