手法を比較
選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。
| Rhetorical Analysis× | Framing Analysis× | |
|---|---|---|
| 分野 | Communication | Communication |
| 系統 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 提唱年≠ | 2017 | 1993 |
| 提唱者≠ | Classical rhetoric (Aristotle); modern criticism systematized by Foss | Robert M. Entman (synthesis); roots in Goffman, Tuchman, Gitlin |
| 種類≠ | Interpretive analysis of how symbolic messages persuade and create meaning | Interpretive-quantitative analysis of how messages select and emphasize aspects of reality |
| 原典≠ | Foss, S. K. (2017). Rhetorical Criticism: Exploration and Practice (5th ed.). Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press. ISBN: 9781478634898 | Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. DOI ↗ |
| 別名 | Rhetorical criticism, Rhetorical analysis method, Rhetorical critique, Retorik Analiz | Frame analysis, Media framing analysis method, Frame mapping, Çerçeveleme Analizi |
| 関連≠ | 4 | 5 |
| 概要≠ | Rhetorical analysis, or rhetorical criticism, is the systematic interpretation of how symbolic messages — speeches, texts, images, campaigns — work to persuade audiences and create meaning. Rooted in classical rhetoric and codified for contemporary practice by scholars like Sonja Foss, it examines the strategies a message uses, the situation it responds to, and the effects it invites, producing an argued interpretation rather than a count. | Framing analysis is a communication research method for studying how messages select certain aspects of a perceived reality and make them more salient — promoting a particular problem definition, causal interpretation, moral evaluation, and treatment recommendation. Building on Robert Entman's influential 1993 synthesis, it moves beyond counting what is present to reconstructing the organizing ideas, or frames, that give media coverage its meaning and persuasive shape. |
| ScholarGateデータセット ↗ |
|
|