ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

遡及的診断精査研究×スクリーニング検査評価×
分野疫学疫学
系統Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
提唱年Formalized 2000s; STARD 2003, revised 20151968 (Wilson-Jungner principles); statistical framework developed 1970s–2000s
提唱者Formalized through the STARD initiative led by Patrick Bossuyt and colleaguesWilson & Jungner (WHO criteria, 1968); foundational work by Pepe, Altman, and others in statistical test evaluation
種類Observational, retrospective study designObservational diagnostic / epidemiological evaluation design
原典Bossuyt, P. M., Reitsma, J. B., Bruns, D. E., et al. (2015). STARD 2015: An Updated List of Essential Items for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies. BMJ, 351, h5527. DOI ↗Wilson, J. M. G., & Jungner, G. (1968). Principles and Practice of Screening for Disease. World Health Organization. Public Health Papers No. 34. link ↗
別名retrospective DAS, retrospective test accuracy study, retrospective index test evaluation, historical diagnostic accuracy studyscreening study, screening performance evaluation, screening accuracy assessment, STE
関連56
概要A retrospective diagnostic accuracy study evaluates how well a diagnostic test (the index test) correctly identifies a target condition by applying it to previously collected data or archived specimens alongside a reference standard. Because both index test results and reference standard results are drawn from existing records or stored material rather than generated prospectively, this design is faster and less costly than a prospective counterpart — but carries specific methodological risks that must be controlled to produce valid estimates of sensitivity, specificity, and related measures.Screening test evaluation is a systematic epidemiological approach for assessing whether a test or program can accurately and cost-effectively identify individuals with a condition before symptoms appear. It quantifies diagnostic performance metrics — sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and the ROC curve — and evaluates whether a screening program meets established public health criteria for adoption and harm-benefit balance.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Retrospective diagnostic accuracy study · Screening Test Evaluation. 2026-06-17に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare