ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

研究ダイアリー×反射的テーマティック・アナリシス×
分野調査方法論質的手法
系統Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
提唱年1981 (methodological codification); diary use in research dates to 19th-century anthropology2006 (seminal paper); explicitly named 'reflexive' from ~2019
提唱者Robert G. Burgess (systematic methodological treatment)Virginia Braun & Victoria Clarke
種類Qualitative data collection and reflexivity toolQualitative research method
原典Burgess, R. G. (1981). Keeping a research diary. Cambridge Journal of Education, 11(1), 75–83. link ↗Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. DOI ↗
別名researcher diary, field diary, research journal, reflexive diaryRTA, reflexive TA, Braun and Clarke thematic analysis, qualitative thematic analysis
関連66
概要A research diary is a systematic, dated log maintained by the researcher throughout a study to record methodological decisions, emergent observations, analytical hunches, and reflections on researcher positionality. Unlike a participant diary, it is authored by the researcher and functions simultaneously as a data source, an audit trail, and a reflexivity instrument.Reflexive Thematic Analysis (RTA) is a widely used qualitative method for identifying, analysing, and interpreting patterns of shared meaning — called themes — across a dataset. Developed by Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke, it is theoretically flexible, works across epistemological positions, and foregrounds the researcher's active, interpretive role rather than treating themes as features that simply emerge from data. It differs from older 'codebook' approaches by treating the analyst's subjectivity as a resource rather than a source of bias to be suppressed.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Research Diary · Reflexive Thematic Analysis. 2026-06-18に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare