手法を比較
選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。
| ペアワイズ・レジーム分析に基づく順序型多基準法× | Analytic Network Process (フィードバックと相互依存性を考慮したAHP)× | |
|---|---|---|
| 分野 | 意思決定 | 意思決定 |
| 系統 | MCDM | MCDM |
| 提唱年≠ | 1983 | 1996 |
| 提唱者≠ | Hinloopen, E., Nijkamp, P., Rietveld, P. | Saaty, T. L. |
| 種類≠ | Pairwise regime matrix aggregation (ordinal weights) | Weight_Subjective (pairwise comparison, supermatrix, network structure) |
| 原典≠ | Hinloopen, E., Nijkamp, P., Rietveld, P. (1983). Qualitative discrete multiple criteria choice models in regional planning. Regional Science and Urban Economics DOI ↗ | Saaty, T. L. (1996). Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: The Analytic Network Process. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh ISBN: 0-9620317-9-8 |
| 別名 | — | — |
| 関連 | 8 | 8 |
| 概要≠ | REGIME (Ordinal multi-criteria method based on pairwise regime analysis) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Hinloopen, E., Nijkamp, P., Rietveld, P. in 1983. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | ANP (Analytic Network Process (AHP with feedback and interdependences)) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saaty, T. L. in 1996. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGateデータセット ↗ |
|
|