ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

定量的優位性を重視した実用主義的混合研究法デザイン×混合研究におけるメタ推論×
分野研究デザイン研究デザイン
系統Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
提唱年1998–20101998–2003
提唱者Tashakkori & Teddlie (mixed methods paradigm discourse); pragmatic strand systematized by Morgan and CreswellAbbas Tashakkori & Charles Teddlie
種類Mixed methods research designMixed methods integration procedure
原典Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (Eds.). (2010). SAGE Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications. ISBN: 978-1412972666Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2009). Foundations of Mixed Methods Research: Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches in the Social and Behavioral Sciences. Sage. ISBN: 978-0761930129
別名QUAN-dominant pragmatic MMR, pragmatic quantitative-priority mixed design, quan-priority pragmatic designmeta-inference, mixed methods overall inference, integrated inference, MMR meta-inference
関連66
概要A mixed methods design in which quantitative data and analysis carry the primary explanatory weight while a smaller qualitative component provides contextual depth. Grounded in philosophical pragmatism, design decisions — including timing, sequencing, and the scope of each strand — are driven by what best answers the research question rather than by adherence to a single paradigmatic tradition.Mixed methods meta-inference is the overarching conclusion drawn at the end of a mixed methods study by systematically combining and integrating the separate inferences produced by the quantitative and qualitative strands. It represents the highest-level interpretive act in mixed methods research: moving beyond strand-specific findings to produce a unified, coherent understanding of the research problem that neither strand could yield alone.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Quantitative-dominant pragmatic mixed methods · Mixed Methods Meta-Inference. 2026-06-18に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare