手法を比較

	Qualitative-Dominant Pragmatic Mixed Methods	プラグマティック混合研究法デザイン
分野	研究デザイン	研究デザイン
系統	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
提唱年	1990s–2010s	Early 2000s (formalised); pragmatism as philosophy late 19th–early 20th century
提唱者	David L. Morgan; John W. Creswell & Vicki L. Plano Clark	John W. Creswell & Vicki L. Plano Clark (formalised); philosophical grounding in William James, John Dewey, Richard Rorty
種類	Mixed methods research design	Mixed methods research design
原典	Morgan, D. L. (2014). Integrating Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: A Pragmatic Approach. Sage. ISBN: 978-1452204949	Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. ISBN: 978-1483344379
別名	QUAL-dominant pragmatic MMR, qualitative-priority pragmatic mixed methods, qual-dominant pragmatic design, QUAL+quan pragmatic	pragmatic MMR, pragmatism-guided mixed methods, pragmatic inquiry design, practical mixed methods
関連	6	6
概要	Qualitative-dominant pragmatic mixed methods is a research design in which a qualitative strand carries the primary weight of the inquiry, while a smaller quantitative component adds breadth or corroboration. Grounded in pragmatism as its philosophical framework, the design treats questions of data type, sequence, and integration as practical choices driven by the research problem rather than by methodological ideology.	Pragmatic mixed methods design is a research approach that selects and combines quantitative and qualitative methods based on what best answers the research question, rather than adhering to a single philosophical paradigm. Rooted in the philosophical tradition of pragmatism — associated with William James, John Dewey, and later Richard Rorty — it treats methodological fit and practical utility as the primary criteria for design decisions. The approach is endorsed by leading mixed methods scholars including Creswell and Plano Clark as the most common philosophical worldview underpinning mixed methods work.