手法を比較
選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。
| 意図的サンプリング× | 典型例サンプリング× | |
|---|---|---|
| 分野 | 調査方法論 | 調査方法論 |
| 系統 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 提唱年≠ | Formalized ~1980–1990 | 1980s (systematized in Patton 1990/2002) |
| 提唱者≠ | Michael Quinn Patton (systematic articulation); roots in early qualitative inquiry | Michael Quinn Patton |
| 種類≠ | Non-probability sampling strategy | Purposive qualitative sampling strategy |
| 原典≠ | Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods (2nd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-0803937796 | Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (3rd ed.). Sage Publications. ISBN: 978-0761919711 |
| 別名 | judgmental sampling, selective sampling, criterion-based sampling, purposeful sampling | typical case selection, modal case sampling, representative case sampling, average case sampling |
| 関連≠ | 4 | 5 |
| 概要≠ | Purposive sampling is a non-probability strategy in which the researcher deliberately selects participants, documents, or cases that are information-rich with respect to the research question. Rather than drawing units at random, the researcher applies explicit criteria aligned with the study's purpose, maximising the depth and relevance of the data collected. It is the default sampling logic in most qualitative research designs and is also used in mixed-methods and applied evaluative work. | Typical case sampling is a purposive strategy in which the researcher deliberately selects cases that represent what is ordinary, normal, or most common within a target group. Rather than seeking outliers or the widest possible variation, the goal is to illustrate and communicate what a typical experience, program, or phenomenon looks like to stakeholders or audiences unfamiliar with it. The strategy is widely used in qualitative evaluation research and program reporting. |
| ScholarGateデータセット ↗ |
|
|