ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

プロトコルに基づくメタエスノグラフィー×質的メタ合成×
分野科学計量学エビデンス統合
系統Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
提唱年1988 (meta-ethnography); protocol-based practice formalised 2010s2007
提唱者Noblit & Hare (meta-ethnography); protocol registration formalised through PROSPERO and eMERGe guidanceSandelowski & Barroso (2007), Popularized by Thomas & Harden (2008)
種類Qualitative evidence synthesis with pre-registered protocolFramework
原典Noblit, G. W., & Hare, R. D. (1988). Meta-Ethnography: Synthesizing Qualitative Studies. Sage. ISBN: 978-0803930742Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8, 45. DOI ↗
別名pre-registered meta-ethnography, prospero meta-ethnography, registered qualitative synthesis, protocol-driven meta-ethnographyQualitative Evidence Synthesis, Thematic Synthesis, Metasynthesis, Qualitative Systematic Review
関連52
概要Protocol-based meta-ethnography is a structured qualitative evidence synthesis that follows Noblit and Hare's meta-ethnography method while requiring a pre-registered, publicly available protocol — typically on PROSPERO — before the review is conducted. Pre-registration constrains post-hoc decision-making, enhances methodological transparency, and aligns qualitative synthesis with the rigour standards now expected by leading journals and funders.Qualitative meta-synthesis is a systematic method for synthesizing findings from multiple qualitative research studies (interviews, focus groups, ethnographies) to develop integrated interpretations and theoretical insights. Formalized by Sandelowski and Barroso (2007) and popularized by Thomas and Harden (2008), qualitative meta-synthesis preserves the rich, contextual, interpretive nature of qualitative evidence while enabling broader conclusions across multiple studies. Unlike quantitative meta-analysis, which pools numbers, qualitative meta-synthesis synthesizes themes, meanings, and conceptual insights—answering questions like 'How do cancer patients experience treatment side effects?' or 'What factors shape patient engagement with preventive health programs?' across multiple studies.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Protocol-based Meta-ethnography · Qualitative Meta-Synthesis. 2026-06-18に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare