ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

PRISMAチェックリスト:システマティックレビューとメタアナリシスの報告基準×ランダム化比較試験のためのコクランのリスク・バイアス評価ツール2.0×
分野研究方法論研究方法論
系統Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
提唱年2021 (original 2009)2019
提唱者Page et al. (PRISMA Group)Jonathan Sterne, Julian Higgins (Cochrane Collaboration)
種類Systematic review author reporting checklistClinician-rated / Research team assessment
原典Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., ... & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. DOI ↗Sterne, J. A., Savović, J., Page, M. J., Elbers, R. G., Blencowe, N. S., Boutron, I., ... & Higgins, J. P. (2019). RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ, 366, l4898. DOI ↗
別名PRISMA, PRISMA 2020RoB 2.0, RoB 2
関連44
概要PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) is a 27-item evidence-based checklist published in 2021 (updated from 2009) to standardize reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Endorsed by over 500 journals, PRISMA is the international standard for evidence synthesis reporting, used across healthcare, psychology, education, and social sciences to ensure transparency and reproducibility.RoB 2 is the Cochrane Collaboration's updated methodology for assessing the risk of bias in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Published in 2019, it replaced the original Cochrane RoB tool with a more structured, transparent approach using signalling questions and domain-based judgments to evaluate five critical sources of bias.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 1 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: PRISMA Checklist · Cochrane RoB 2.0. 2026-06-20に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare