手法を比較

	実践的単一事例実験計画	シングル被験者実験計画
分野	実験計画法	実験計画法
系統	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
提唱年	1960s–1970s (SSED roots); pragmatic framing prominent from 1990s onward	1960s (Sidman 1960; formal applied codification by Kazdin and Baer in 1970s–1980s)
提唱者	Applied behavior analysis tradition (Sidman, Baer, Wolf, Risley); pragmatic adaptation from clinical research	Murray Sidman (foundational tactics); B. F. Skinner (applied behavior analysis lineage)
種類	Single-case experimental design variant	Experimental research design
原典	Kazdin, A. E. (2011). Single-Case Research Designs: Methods for Clinical and Applied Settings (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. ISBN: 978-0195341881	Kazdin, A. E. (1982). Single-Case Research Designs: Methods for Clinical and Applied Settings. Oxford University Press. ISBN: 978-0195030440
別名	pragmatic SSED, pragmatic N-of-1 design, real-world single-case design, applied single-subject experimental design	SSED, single-case experimental design, n-of-1 design, intrasubject replication design
関連	6	6
概要	Pragmatic single-subject experimental design applies the logic of single-case experimentation — repeated measurement, baseline comparison, and phase manipulation — within real-world practice settings rather than controlled laboratories. It allows practitioners and clinicians to rigorously evaluate interventions for individual participants without requiring large samples, making it especially valuable in applied, clinical, and educational contexts where heterogeneity across individuals is high.	Single-subject experimental design (SSED) establishes experimental control by repeatedly measuring one individual (or a small number of individuals) across baseline and intervention phases, using the participant as their own control. Instead of comparing groups, it compares the participant's own behavior across conditions over time. Widely used in applied behavior analysis, special education, rehabilitation, and clinical psychology, SSED allows causal inference from small or unique samples where group designs are impractical.