手法を比較
選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。
| 実用的対照群実験計画× | 要因統制群実験計画× | |
|---|---|---|
| 分野 | 実験計画法 | 実験計画法 |
| 系統 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 提唱年≠ | 1967 (seminal distinction); 2009 (PRECIS operationalization) | 1926–1935 |
| 提唱者≠ | Schwartz & Lellouch (pragmatic vs explanatory distinction); extended by PRECIS framework (Thorpe et al.) | Ronald A. Fisher |
| 種類≠ | Experimental design (pragmatic variant) | Experimental design |
| 原典≠ | Schwartz, D., & Lellouch, J. (1967). Explanatory and pragmatic attitudes in therapeutical trials. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 20(8), 637–648. DOI ↗ | Fisher, R. A. (1935). The Design of Experiments. Oliver and Boyd. link ↗ |
| 別名 | pragmatic controlled trial, effectiveness trial with control group, real-world control group design, pragmatic comparative design | factorial controlled experiment, factorial design with control, factorial RCT with control arm, multi-factor controlled experiment |
| 関連 | 6 | 6 |
| 概要≠ | A pragmatic control group experimental design tests whether an intervention works under routine, real-world conditions by comparing it against a control condition — typically usual care or an active comparator — rather than a tightly controlled placebo. It prioritises external validity and applicability over the internal purity of an explanatory efficacy trial, asking whether an intervention makes a meaningful difference to people as they are actually treated in practice. | A factorial control group experimental design crosses two or more independent variables (factors) in a fully factorial structure while including at least one condition that serves as a no-treatment or standard-treatment control. This allows researchers to simultaneously estimate the main effect of each factor, their interactions, and the size of those effects relative to a meaningful baseline, maximising both causal precision and experimental efficiency. |
| ScholarGateデータセット ↗ |
|
|