手法を比較
選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。
| ポストコロニアル分析× | ナラティブ分析× | |
|---|---|---|
| 分野 | 質的手法 | 質的手法 |
| 系統 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 提唱年≠ | Late 20th century (Said 1978; Spivak 1988; Bhabha 1994) | 1967 (foundational); 2008 (canonical handbook) |
| 提唱者≠ | Edward Said, Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak, Homi K. Bhabha | Catherine Kohler Riessman (seminal synthesis, 2008); roots in Labov & Waletzky (1967) |
| 種類≠ | Qualitative research method | Qualitative interpretive method |
| 原典≠ | Said, E. W. (1978). Orientalism. Pantheon Books. ISBN: 978-0394428147 | Riessman, C.K. (2008). Narrative Methods for the Human Sciences. Sage. link ↗ |
| 別名 | postcolonial criticism, postcolonial theory, colonial discourse analysis, decolonial analysis | narrative inquiry, life history analysis, biographical research, Anlatı Analizi (Narrative Analysis) |
| 関連 | 6 | 6 |
| 概要≠ | Postcolonial analysis is a qualitative research approach that critically examines the lasting cultural, political, epistemic, and social effects of colonialism and imperialism. Drawing on foundational works by Edward Said, Gayatri Spivak, and Homi Bhabha, it interrogates how colonial power relations are reproduced in texts, institutions, identities, and knowledge systems — and how colonised or marginalised voices can be recovered, amplified, and centred. | Narrative analysis is a qualitative research method, synthesised canonically by Catherine Kohler Riessman (2008), that examines how individuals storise their lived experiences and construct meaning through the telling. Drawing on life history, biographical, and narrative inquiry traditions, it treats the story itself — not just its content — as the unit of analysis, attending to temporal sequence, plot structure, and the social context in which a narrative is produced. |
| ScholarGateデータセット ↗ |
|
|