ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

多カテゴリ構成概念妥当性×確認的因子分析(CFA)×
分野心理測定学心理測定学
系統Latent structureLatent structure
提唱年1992–20001969
提唱者Building on Messick (1989) and IRT extensions by Masters, Muraki, and SamejimaKarl Gustav Jöreskog
種類Psychometric validity frameworkHypothesis-testing latent variable model
原典Muraki, E. (1992). A generalized partial credit model: Application of an EM algorithm. Applied Psychological Measurement, 16(2), 159–176. DOI ↗Jöreskog, K. G. (1969). A general approach to confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 34(2), 183–202. DOI ↗
別名polytomous item construct validity, ordered-category construct validity, polytomous measurement validity, multi-category scale validityCFA, confirmatory FA, measurement model, restricted factor analysis
関連64
概要Polytomous construct validity refers to the evaluation of whether a scale composed of ordered, multi-category items (e.g., Likert or rating-scale items) genuinely measures the intended latent construct. It extends classical validity frameworks to polytomous measurement models — such as the Graded Response Model or Generalized Partial Credit Model — ensuring that ordered response categories function as designed and that the resulting scores reflect the target construct.Confirmatory factor analysis tests a researcher-specified factor structure against observed data. Unlike exploratory approaches, the researcher decides in advance which indicators load on which latent factor, and the model is evaluated by how closely the implied covariance matrix reproduces the sample covariance matrix. CFA is central to scale validation, construct validity assessment, and measurement invariance testing.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Polytomous Construct Validity · Confirmatory factor analysis. 2026-06-15に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare