ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

Political Feasibility Analysis×Advocacy Coalition Framework×
分野Public PolicyPublic Policy
系統Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
提唱年19721993
提唱者Arnold J. MeltsnerPaul Sabatier & Hank Jenkins-Smith
種類Assessment of the political viability of policy optionsTheory of the policy process
原典Meltsner, A. J. (1972). Political feasibility and policy analysis. Public Administration Review, 32(6), 859–867. DOI ↗Sabatier, P. A., & Jenkins-Smith, H. C. (Eds.) (1993). Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach. Boulder, CO: Westview Press. ISBN: 9780813316499
別名Political Feasibility Assessment, Feasibility Analysis for Policy, Politics of Policy AnalysisACF, Sabatier-Jenkins-Smith Framework, Advocacy Coalition Approach
関連44
概要Political feasibility analysis assesses whether a policy option can realistically be adopted, enacted and sustained given the political environment — the actors involved, their interests and beliefs, the resources they command, and the arenas in which they act. Arnold Meltsner's classic 1972 article 'Political Feasibility and Policy Analysis' argued that analysts who attend only to economic or technical merit and ignore politics produce recommendations that are dead on arrival. By systematically appraising the political viability of options, the method helps distinguish proposals that are merely good on paper from those that can actually survive the political process.The Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF) is a theory of the policy process developed by Paul Sabatier and Hank Jenkins-Smith from the late 1980s and consolidated in their 1993 volume Policy Change and Learning. It explains policy stability and change over long periods by analysing competing coalitions of actors within a policy subsystem who are bound together by shared beliefs. Policy change is understood as a function of the interaction among these belief-based coalitions, the policy-oriented learning that occurs over time, and external events and shocks that can shift the balance of power among them.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 1 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Political Feasibility Analysis · Advocacy Coalition Framework. 2026-06-25に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare