ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

政策評価のための周辺構造モデル×反実仮想による影響評価(CIE)×
分野因果推論因果推論
系統Regression modelRegression model
提唱年20001970s–2000s
提唱者James M. Robins, Miguel A. Hernan, Babette BrumbackHeckman, Imbens, Rubin, and the program evaluation literature
種類Causal inference / weighted regressionCausal inference / program evaluation
原典Robins, J. M., Hernan, M. A., & Brumback, B. (2000). Marginal structural models and causal inference in epidemiology. Epidemiology, 11(5), 550–560. DOI ↗Heckman, J. J., & Vytlacil, E. J. (2007). Econometric evaluation of social programs, Part I: Causal models, structural models and econometric policy evaluation. Handbook of Econometrics, 6B, 4779-4874. DOI ↗
別名MSM for policy evaluation, policy MSM, causal MSM, structural policy weighting modelCIE, counterfactual evaluation, counterfactual policy evaluation, impact evaluation
関連65
概要A Policy Evaluation Marginal Structural Model (MSM) is a causal inference framework that estimates the population-average effect of a policy by using inverse probability weighting to create a pseudo-population in which treatment assignment is independent of measured confounders, enabling unbiased comparison of potential outcomes under different policy scenarios from observational data.Counterfactual Impact Evaluation is a family of causal methods that estimates the effect of an intervention by comparing what actually happened to participants with what would have happened had the intervention not taken place. Formalised in the Rubin Causal Model and extended by Heckman, Imbens and others, CIE underlies most modern program and policy evaluation practice.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Policy Evaluation Marginal Structural Model · Counterfactual Impact Evaluation. 2026-06-18に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare