ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

政策評価における二重頑健推定量×二重に頑健な推定量(AIPW)×
分野因果推論因果推論
系統Regression modelRegression model
提唱年1994-20052005
提唱者Robins, Rotnitzky & Zhao (1994); Bang & Robins (2005)Robins & Rotnitzky; Bang & Robins
種類Semiparametric causal estimatorSemiparametric causal estimator
原典Bang, H., & Robins, J. M. (2005). Doubly robust estimation in missing data and causal inference models. Biometrics, 61(4), 962-973. DOI ↗Robins, J. M. & Rotnitzky, A. (1995). Semiparametric Efficiency in Multivariate Regression Models with Missing Data. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90(429), 122-129. DOI ↗
別名DR estimation for policy, augmented IPW for policy evaluation, AIPW policy evaluation, doubly robust policy analysisAIPW, augmented inverse probability weighting, doubly robust estimator, Çift Gürbüz Kestirici (Augmented IPW / AIPW)
関連55
概要Policy Evaluation Doubly Robust Estimation applies the doubly robust (DR) estimator to assess the causal effect of a public policy or programme. It combines a model of treatment assignment (propensity score) with a model of the outcome, and requires only one of the two models to be correctly specified to produce a consistent estimate of the average treatment effect, making it a resilient tool for programme evaluation.Doubly Robust Estimation, also called Augmented Inverse Probability Weighting (AIPW), is a semiparametric method for estimating causal treatment effects that combines an outcome regression model with a propensity (treatment) model. Developed in the work of Robins & Rotnitzky (1995) and Bang & Robins (2005), it stays consistent as long as at least one of the two models is correctly specified.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Policy Evaluation Doubly Robust Estimation · Doubly Robust Estimation. 2026-06-17に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare