ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

Placemaking Evaluation×Visual Preference Survey×
分野Urban StudiesUrban Studies
系統Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
提唱年20001994
提唱者Project for Public Spaces (drawing on William H. Whyte and Jan Gehl)Anton C. Nelessen
種類Structured before/after evaluation of public-space quality and useSurvey eliciting community design preferences by rating images
原典Carmona, M. (2019). Principles for public space design, planning to do better. URBAN DESIGN International, 24, 47–59. DOI ↗Nelessen, A. C. (1994). Visions for a New American Dream: Process, Principles, and an Ordinance to Plan and Design Small Communities. American Planning Association. ISBN: 9780918286888
別名Place Diagram Evaluation, Power of 10 Assessment, Public-Space Quality Audit, Before-and-After Placemaking StudyVPS, Visual Preference Analysis, Image Preference Survey, Nelessen Visual Preference Survey
関連44
概要Placemaking evaluation is the structured assessment of whether a public-space intervention — a redesigned plaza, a reclaimed street, a new pocket park — actually makes the place more sociable, comfortable, and well used. Drawing on the observational tradition of William H. Whyte and Jan Gehl and codified by the Project for Public Spaces, it combines qualitative place-quality judgements with countable measures of activity, often comparing the same site before and after the change. The result is evidence that a place works for people rather than a designer's assertion that it should.A visual preference survey (VPS) elicits a community's design preferences by asking residents to rate a curated set of photographs — of streets, buildings, public spaces, and landscapes — on a simple numeric scale. Developed and popularized by planner Anton Nelessen, it turns the often vague question of what a community wants its environment to look like into comparable scores, revealing which images people reward, which they reject, and where they agree or disagree. The averaged ratings give planners a defensible visual brief grounded in resident preference rather than professional taste.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Placemaking Evaluation · Visual Preference Survey. 2026-06-24に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare