ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

岩石学的分析×岩盤分類×
分野地球科学地球科学
系統Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
提唱年18581974
提唱者Henry Clifton SorbyBieniawski and Barton
種類compositional characterization pipelineengineering geology assessment pipeline
原典Tucker, M. E. (2003). Sedimentary Rocks in the Field: A Color Guide (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons. link ↗Bieniawski, Z. T. (1989). Engineering Rock Mass Classifications. John Wiley & Sons. link ↗
別名microscopy analysis, thin section analysis, modal composition determinationRMR system, Q-system classification, rock quality designation
関連54
概要Petrographic analysis is the microscopic examination of rock thin sections to determine mineral composition, grain size, texture, and diagenetic alteration. Pioneered by Sorby in 1858, this method remains the gold standard for understanding lithology and has evolved to include quantitative image analysis and cathodoluminescence. Petrographic data anchor well-log interpretation, validate seismic velocity models, and constrain paleoenvironmental and diagenetic histories.Rock mass classification is the systematic assessment of rock quality and mechanical behavior in engineering geology, combining field observations of jointing, weathering, and strength into a numerical index. Pioneered by Bieniawski (RMR system, 1974) and Barton (Q-system, 1974), these methods enable rapid site assessment and guide design of excavations, dams, and slopes. Classification bridges the gap between small laboratory samples and large field-scale behavior.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 3 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Petrographic Analysis · Rock Mass Classification. 2026-06-17に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare