手法を比較

	Participatory Poverty Assessment	Wealth Ranking
分野	Development Studies	Anthropology
系統	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
提唱年	2000	1994
提唱者	World Bank (Deepa Narayan; Caroline Robb); building on Robert Chambers's participatory tradition	Participatory Rural Appraisal tradition (Robert Chambers and colleagues)
種類	Participatory qualitative poverty analysis method	Participatory stratification of households by locally defined wealth or wellbeing
原典	Narayan, D., Patel, R., Schafft, K., Rademacher, A., & Koch-Schulte, S. (2000). Voices of the Poor: Can Anyone Hear Us? New York: Oxford University Press for the World Bank. ISBN: 9780195216011	Chambers, R. (1994). The origins and practice of participatory rural appraisal. World Development, 22(7), 953–969.
別名	PPA, Participatory Poverty Study, Voices of the Poor Method, Participatory Poverty Diagnosis	Wellbeing Ranking, Wealth Ranking Card Sort, Social Stratification Ranking, Wealth Grouping
関連	4	4
概要	A Participatory Poverty Assessment (PPA) is an instrument for understanding poverty from the perspective of poor people themselves, using participatory methods to elicit their own definitions, experiences, and priorities rather than imposing externally fixed indicators. Pioneered by the World Bank in the 1990s and made famous by the multi-country 'Voices of the Poor' study, the PPA combines participatory rural appraisal tools with a deliberate concern to influence policy, complementing rather than replacing the quantitative household surveys on which official poverty measurement rests.	Wealth ranking is a participatory rural appraisal technique in which knowledgeable community members sort cards representing local households into a set of wealth or wellbeing strata that they themselves define. Several informants each perform the sort independently, and because they may use different numbers of piles, their placements are converted to a common scale and averaged into a relative wealth score for every household. The procedure produces both a stratification of the community and, crucially, the local (emic) criteria people actually use to judge who is poor and who is well off.