手法を比較

	パラフレーズ検出	感情分析	テキスト分類	テキスト含意
分野	テキストマイニング	テキストマイニング	テキストマイニング	テキストマイニング
系統	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
提唱年	—	—	—	—
提唱者	—	—	—	—
種類	NLP sentence-pair classification task	NLP text-classification task	Supervised NLP classification task	NLP sentence-pair classification task
原典	Dolan, W. B. & Brockett, C. (2005). Automatically Constructing a Corpus of Sentential Paraphrases. Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Paraphrasing (IWP).	Pang, B. & Lee, L. (2008). Opinion Mining and Sentiment Analysis. Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval, 2(1-2), 1-135.	Joachims, T. (1998). Text Categorization with Support Vector Machines: Learning with Many Relevant Features. ECML 1998. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1398. Springer.	Dagan, I., Glickman, O. & Magnini, B. (2006). The PASCAL Recognising Textual Entailment Challenge.
別名	Parafroz Tespiti (Paraphrase Detection), paraphrase identification, semantic equivalence detection	opinion mining, polarity detection, duygu analizi	text categorization, document classification, topic classification, metin sınıflandırma	natural language inference, NLI, recognising textual entailment, RTE
関連	4	3	4	4
概要	Paraphrase detection is a natural-language-processing task that decides whether two sentences expressed in different wordings carry the same meaning. The task and its benchmark resources were established by Dolan and Brockett (2005), and it underpins plagiarism detection, question matching, and data deduplication.	Sentiment analysis, also called opinion mining, is a natural-language-processing task that detects the emotional tone of text — typically classifying it as positive, negative, or neutral. It turns unstructured opinion text into structured, quantifiable polarity signals using one of three families of approaches: sentiment lexicons, trained machine-learning classifiers, or pretrained transformer models.	Text classification, also called text categorization, is a supervised natural-language-processing task that automatically assigns documents to predefined categories. Building on the support-vector-machine approach to text categorization established by Joachims (1998) and consolidated in the text-mining literature by Aggarwal and Zhai (2012), it powers tasks such as spam detection and topic classification by learning from labelled examples.	Textual entailment, also known as natural language inference (NLI), is the natural-language-processing task of deciding whether one piece of text (the premise) entails a second piece of text (the hypothesis), contradicts it, or is neutral with respect to it. Formalised by the PASCAL Recognising Textual Entailment Challenge (Dagan, Glickman & Magnini, 2006) and broadened by the MultiNLI corpus (Williams, Nangia & Bowman, 2018), it underpins question answering and fact-verification pipelines.